Friday, November 19, 2010
What is a handle system anyway?
Friday, November 12, 2010
A little more with SFX...
Saturday, November 6, 2010
Data Standards
"Library Standards and E-Resource Management: A Survey of Current Initiatives and Standards Efforts" by Oliver Pesch
J1a for subscription archives
JR2 - turnaways by month and journal (due to simultaneous user limit)
uncommon -
JR3 (optional) - number of successful item requests and turnaways by month, journal and page type.
JR4 (optional) - total searches run by month and service
JR5 - number of successful full-text article requests by year and journal
Database Reports:
DB1 total number of searches and sessions by month and database
DB2 turnaways by month and database
DB3 total number of searches and sessions by month and service (branded group of online info products)
Consortium Reports
CR1 # of successful full-text article/e--book requests by month
CR2 # of searches by database
report format compliance (manual review)
article request counting (test scripts)
database session/search counting (test scripts)
- Don’t account for: automated search filtering (bots, crawlers, LOCKSS, etc)
HTML vs PDF downloads - some services display HTML full-text along with abstract - is this a “download?”
“Library Standards and e-resource management”
- E-Journal lifecycle:
- 1. Acquire: titles, prices, subscriptions, license terms, etc.
- 2. Provide access: cataloging, holdings lists, proxy support, searching and linking
- 3. Administer: use rights and restrictions, holdings, title list changes
- 4. Support: contacts, trouble shooting
- 5. Evaluate: usage data, cost data
- 6. Renew: title lists, business terms, renewal orders, invoices (groups help create standards as management resources)
“Standards for the Management of ER”
- Promote interoperability, efficiency, and quality
- Another way to look at the lifecycle:
- 1. Selection
- 2. Acquisition
- 3. Administration
- 4. Access control
- 5. Assessment
“COUNTER: Current Developments and Future Plans”
- Usage statistics as part of the librarian’s toolkit
- Vendors have a practical standard for usage stats on their major product lines
- Standard usage stats Harvesting Initiative (SUSHI): automated retrieval of the COUNTER usage reports into local systems (part of the XML schema) will indicate the intensity of use of a database, popularity of a database.
- Journal usage factor: total usage (COUNTER JR1 Data)/total # of articles published online (within a specific date range)
- PIRUS: Publisher and Institutional Repository Usage Statistics: an invaluable tool in demonstrating the value of individual publications and entire online collections.
Thursday, November 4, 2010
Electronic Resource Management Systems
There are a few benefits and challenges that come with each product. A few of the benefits: ERM Systems improve overall management communication, there is auto population of data, and an ability to update information automatically/quite easily.
If you're working with EBSCONet, there is the added bonus of automatic management of all EBSCO materials. If you're library subscribes to many of EBSCO's databases, this might be a good option for you. However, for all other vendor products, ERM must be manually completed which is tedious and takes time. Any ERM system that requires manual data entry (and I'm not sure there's one that we went over that doesn't require at least some data entry) leaves room for error. Misspellings, typos, and entering in different license material occurs because usually a group of people will contribute to data entry, not just one person. This can throw an entire section off. This product was recommended for small - medium sized university libraries. One library (Kent State, I believe), even said this system would help them record and remember deadlines and contract deals. For them, it was better than working on a Google Calendar and Excel spreadsheets.
Innovated Interfaces Millenium and Serials Solution 360 can come as part of a package deal (link resolver software AND an ERM system all in one!) But once again, it depends on the type of library. At the University of Wisconsin, we use Ex Libris' link resolver software (SFX), but their ERM system (Verde) would never work for us due to the breadth and depth of our collection.
Each unit in this class adds one more corporation to the list of commercial services provided for libraries, specifically academic libraries. And with my Find It presentation this week, we'll be able to add yet another! Up to this point, the biggest lesson I have learned is to be patient and thoughtful with purchasing decisions - each product is slightly different and could potentially hinder certain areas of librarians' work.
Unit 9: Electronic Resource Management Systems
- Title by title management no longer works
- Homegrown systems became popular in the late 1990s/ early 2000s
- Strong focus on data standards, issues related to license expression and usage data
- Most companies now offer an ERM system as part of the ILS (interoperability is one advantage to working with one company’s product, but they are also at the mercy of the company for updates – could end up under supported)
- a few things to watch out for: does the system work well with what you already have?
- Is it reliable and sustainable?
- Cost?
- What is the cost of advancements vs the benefits to the user?
- Refer back to ERM checklist
- Implementation of a system: staffing (who should be involved, how they will be structured within the library, training, etc)
- Communication across library departments is key (especially with managing work flow)
- Questions to ask before selecting a certain system:
- 1. “What elements are important to include for you library?
- 2. “What elements are repetitive across license agreements and provide little value or are inconsequential in describing?”
- 3. “Who will be responsible for providing consistent interpretation of license language and meaning?”
- 4. “What tools or resources are available to assist individuals in the mapping process?”